According to US officials, Navy SEALs found a large stash of pornography at the Pakistani compound of Osama bin Laden, and the stash has been described as 'modern' and 'fairly extensive.' Bin Laden's Abbottabad compound did not have Internet connection or other hard-wired communication networks, but officials did find hundred's of flash drives, and I bet that's how OBL snuck in the porn, which he then watched on TV's that we know were equipped with the ability to show video (there are video's out there of him watching himself on TV).
To build up such an extensive and modern stash of porn takes a lot of time, I imagine, and this would perfectly explain why we haven't heard a whole lot out of him since 9/11. He fled into a hole for a while before eventually settling into a dirty ugly compound where he spent his days paying couriers to bring in modern pornography for him to watch. Case closed- we know know exactly what OBL has been doing for the past 10 years.
Now We Know What Osama Was Doing Last 10 Years: Downloading Porn
"Disgusting" GOP Attempt to Defund Child Pornography Viewing Causes Democrats to Vote Against a Jobs Bill
"It's absurd," Rep. Brian Baird (D-Wash.) said. "It's specious, and it's disgusting. And those are the nicest things I can say about it."
"For anyone that is concerned about federal employees watching pornography, they just saw a pornographic movie. It's called; 'Motion to Recommit,'" Science Committee Chairman and bill author Rep. Bart Gordon (D-Tenn) said.
That's right- according to the Democrats, the GOP's attempt to prohibit federal funds from going "to salaries to those officially disciplined for violations regarding the viewing, downloading, or exchanging of pornography, including child pornography, on a federal computer or while performing official government duties" is the same thing as the portrayal of explicit sexual subject matter for the purposes of sexual excitement and erotic satisfaction and is disgusting, specious, and absurd.
Democrats are hard at work thinking of new ways to give away taxpayer money and this week came up with a federal giveaway program for politically connected science, research and training firms. The bill was moving through the House and was going to pass, but then the GOP attached a provision to the above provision to the bill. Democrats were forced to choose between jobs and no money going to federal officials looking at porn on taxpayer computers during work hours, or no jobs and federal officials looking at porn on taxpayer computers during work hours.
Democrats choose no jobs and porn for government employees. That's the party you support if you vote Democrat next election.
Poverty Porn courtesy of Médecins Sans Frontières
More on Poverty Porn in Aid Thoughts:
Aid Watch, after recently discussing the do’s and don’ts of intelligent charity advertising, have unearthed this new ad from Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF). Take a moment and watch it:More here
via Texas in Africa
Poverty Porn courtesy of Médecins Sans Frontières
More on Poverty Porn in Aid Thoughts:
Aid Watch, after recently discussing the do’s and don’ts of intelligent charity advertising, have unearthed this new ad from Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF). Take a moment and watch it:More here
via Texas in Africa
Quick Hits
- Blacklooks points us to a Jezebel post on "Charity Porn" a topic we have covered earlier.
- Kim Tan of SpringHill Management argues that “FDI is the key. I’m from Asia, and that’s how Asia has developed, bringing in capital, technology and inspiring young entrepreneurs who build businesses.”-NYTimes
- Mo Ibrahim and others at Zeitgeist discuss technology as an enabler in India and Africa
- Anna Nadgrodkiewicz writes about Senegal's lost "Concrete Generation":
The government seems to be primarily concerned with investing in physical infrastructure of questionable utility to the poor, rather than reforming the country’s institutional infrastructure that would make it easier for the poor to reap the benefits of legal entrepreneurship
Democrats Propose Regulating Internet
Why has the internet been so successful? Because it has been largely unregulated. That's kind of the secret to creating wealth in society- you let all the greatness of man shine through in an unregulated environment. Sure, there is a lot of bad stuff that goes along with it (cyber-stalking, porn, etc), but on the whole, the internet has been very successful on many different levels. It reminds me of what happened after telephones were deregulated (the explosion of cellphones and now iPhones and Blackberries) or the continued success of the virtually unregulated soda pop market (which Obama and Democrats in Congress have just began to attack).
But if there is one thing that we have learned about Democrats during their control of our governmental institutions over the last couple years is that what Democrats do is find successful, thriving, profitable areas of the economy and kill them with taxes, regulation, and government oversight. America's health care system is about to severely drop in quality while becoming considerably more expensive now that the Democrats are going to regulate it more than it already was (and health care was already expensive, inefficient, and not top quality because of heavy government regulations). The Democrat's cap and trade scam will be the final nail in the coffin for manufacturing.
But what about the internet? Surely Democrats, who have pretended to care about free speech such that idiot social libertarians voted for them, would not attack the internet with regulations and taxes? Didn't we have to live with the screeching by social liberals who were afraid that it was the Republican Bush who was going to do this for years... for 8 years... and yet never did? Via RedState:
Last week FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski and his fellow Democrats decided to take a significant step toward gaining that control by opening for public comment their proposed changes to Internet regulation. The FCC currently classifies Internet service providers as information services, which prohibits significant government regulation. Genachowski seeks to classify them as telecommunications services, which would give the FCC a much stronger regulatory hand. This change of classification would likely result in strict government regulation of the Internet, despite the Chairman’s promise to rule – er… regulate with a “light touch”. Combine that with May’s draft report from the Federal Trade Commission considering such options as rewriting copyright law to favor of print media, creating a “journalism” division of AmeriCorps, or taxing Internet devices to support newspapers, and the future doesn’t look particularly rosy for all things Internet related.This is scary stuff. In case you haven't noticed, my blog has gone after Democrats pretty hard, exposing their various schemes to violate my freedom of life, liberty, and the pursuit of property. I'm pretty sure that Obama and the Democrats in Congress feel that I am not a 'legitimate' journalistic enterprise, and thus don't get 1st amendment rights, and so will shut me down once they gain control of the internet. I'm pretty sure that a 'light touch' will mean that I'll be slapped down, junk lawsuits will be filed against me, I'll have to pay some sort of tax for maintaining a site on the interent, or some other slimy Democrat plot will work to further deprive me of my god-given rights.
Oh, I know, the leftists were all worried that Bush was going to do this, but Bush never even got as far as Obama has, and Bush was at it for 8 years and Obama has only been ruling us like the tyrant that he is for less than 2 years. Imagine what will happen if the Democrats keep control of the House and Senate for another 2 years because you didn't do anything to support the Republican candidates for Congress. We're stuck with Obama for 2 more years, but he can't continue to rule unchecked like this, where he believes in all his hubris that he has the legitimate power to control the internet.
Filtration Fever Hits China (and US)
You can't visit China without seeing the western influence there. Our tour guide had a Justin Bieber haircut that he had proudly made himself. Chinese who cannot speak English can sing in perfect Bieberese "Baby, Baby, Baby..." Ah, Bieber Fever is Everywhere.
Government Snow
But, the government is everywhere too. In the sky, on the ground, everywhere.
The government made it snow on Saturday of the Flat Classroom conference. Snow?
 |
| Flat Classroom Conference 2011 - February Beijing, China |
As I met Julie Lindsay the lead organizer for the conference, I commented how odd it was that it snowed that day. She laughed in her lilting sort of way
"Ah, the government made it snow last night, it is no big deal."Others from Beijing verified this.
"I can see the snow cannons, they fire them near my house and seed the clouds," said Julie.
Others said that this is a frequent occurence in Colorado and Utah where they need snow. I'm not sure but something in me gets upset at governments controlling the weather.
But it shouldn't be surprising as filters have a whole lot of influence on the weather inside the computer screens. They can cast government snow upon the seeds of discontent and revolution. The can just cast snow upon any and all collaboration by chilling the pipes upon which such collaboration flows.
Yes, China is blocking Google services
I can confirm beyond a shadow of a doubt that China is aggressively blocking Google services. When I arrived in China in February, it was during the time when Middle Eastern unrest was spreading and I could not check my gmail for the first two days even behind my well-selected VPN. Google Docs was unstable as well.
She Who Shall Not Be Named
In fact, we had one young lady named Jasmine and because the government was so heavily filtering the word "Jasmine" (the Jasmine revolution) we renamed her on our wiki and in our projects to keep from losing our wiki. Our behind the scenes joke was that Jasmine was "she who shall not be named" as we did not want to speak the word.
The Company Who Shall not Be Named
Now, my friends in China are quietly moving to yahoo accounts just in case they cannot get back into their gmail. Even with VPN's, Western expatriates are cut off from most Google services: docs, calendars, especially gmail. Unstable and unusable.
Keeping it Flat Anyway
Yes, this has put a hitch in things for Flat Classroom - an organization of global collaboration for students that we have kept decidedly apolitical. We are about teaching. Teaching technology, asychronous collaboration, online leadership skills. We believe that you can't have excellence in education without global collaboration. Period. And yet, when things happen like this it can set us back.
This is nothing new. We will press forward.
The Great Firewall of China
From what I understand, China has 7 firewall centers as part of their "Great Firewall of China" and these firewalls have been locked down tighter and tighter over the past few months.
Filtration Fever
in China
Despite the influence of entertainment, right now, not only can my Chinese friends not read this blog but now, they cannot read my email.
 |
| David Truss, Pair a Dimes Blog |
"The Students Live website provides a number of different ways to connect and interact with the Olympic reporter student bloggers. However, we live in China which filters a lot of social software websites and so these were the options that my Grade 9 teacher was confronted with:
Facebook: BLOCKED
Twitter: BLOCKED
YouTube: BLOCKED
Blogspot Blogs: BLOCKED
Flickr: (recently) BLOCKED (again)
I had to use my VPN to bypass the Chinese filter in order to cut and paste the blog post, mentioned above, into an email so that my teacher could read it in his class. A potential global ‘conversation’ reduced to a reading, confined to a classroom. Frustrating!
Now here is the thing… I chose to move to a country where a lot of sites get blocked. I can’t imagine what it’s like for teachers in the ‘free world’ that have their own school districts do this to them!"
in the US
We in the US cannot look down our trusty 1Gbps Internet connections at our Chinese friends.
I can tell you from experience, the two toughest places to collaborate IN THE WORLD are: any school in China and US public schools.
Thank God for the progressive US schools, public and private, who collaborate anyway and that we have many of them in our projects. These schools are usually characterized by extraordinary leadership who understand that:
YOU CANNOT HAVE EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION WITHOUT GLOBAL COLLABORATION.
What do schools block?
Like China, most US public schools won't allow unblocking of even one Ning - even educational ones like Digiteen, Flat Classroom, or NetGen. They put our emails from us to the teachers into their blacklist filters and teachers can't even get started. Joining a Google Group or Google calendar at school is out of the question.
They won't allow kids to wiki because "people write porn on wikis." (Yes, I had a school that said that.) Sad.
Some teachers have to create non-school emails and accounts and do work from home to make global collaboration happen in the classroom. Their filters are that locked down and no method exists for unblocking anything.
I think that we have to look at our practices and our filtering here in the US very closely.
Filter fever is a symptom of fear. We all see clearly what China is afraid of.
But what on earth are US public schools afraid of?
- Are we afraid that our kids might learn to work with someone from another country? That is a business requirement.
- Are we afraid that we might have to shuffle our work day to work with someone from another time zone? We are surrounded by oceans that soak up the time zones and need to work through this.
- Are we afraid of a future where we can no longer keep prosperity on our shores by the boundary of our country? We already live in a world where money flows through the Internet and can shift the GDP of whole countries in a day due to websites hosted in country.
Every Student Collaborates
Filter out the smut but please, we should be able to allow meaningful global collaboration with students all over the world for EVERY US public school system. It can be done inexpensively or for free - the only cost is to move outside our comfort zone.
We work so hard measuring if each individual child is learning that we forget to see if they can work together at all.
In this day of budget cuts, this is something we can do to invest in our future that won't cost a lot of money and will pay huge dividends in future generations. Most students are woefully unprepared for this. Don't say "they are already connected now on Facebook." It simply isn't applicable to the professional environment where they are headed.
Collaborate or be unemployed.
We Love Our Walled Window boxes?
I love my country (the US) and it disheartens me to know that our very future lies in collaborating with countries like India and China and all of the world and we continue to "wall our gardens."
The problem is that I'd hardly call the technology ecosystems at most schools a garden - they are probably more like a windowbox if anything. Some would even say windowdressing as their internal networks languish unused with kids forgetting passwords and not logging in for months.
Let me repeat the motto of our Flat Classroom Conference: there is no excellence in education without global collaboration.
The question is NOT: "What are we keeping out?" The question should be "What are we letting in?"
Remember your noble calling teachers, administrators, ed tech leaders. Few such callings are as noble as this: to promote students working together in the K12 level so when they grow up we have a world that can work together. Promoting collaboration and collaboration from the bottom up.
